Heung Yee Kuk advocates homeland, wide density and high limit building Dingxia

There are about 1,200 hectares of rural land in the New Territories. The maximum number of building blocks is 3 floors. The Heung Yee Kuk considers that the roadside and the rural areas with transport facilities have the potential to consider the relaxation of the density and the construction of the Ding Building. There is a need to review the small house policy.

Close to the roadside, you can relax

The Heung Yee Kuk held a seminar. The Chairman of the Heung Yee Kuk, Liu Ye-keung, mentioned that the rural development zone in Sheung Shui and other places is located at the roadside. There are sufficient transport facilities nearby to develop housing and can be released through public-private partnership development.

Some of the frozen rural villages outside the townships are currently not built as small houses or other dwellings. They are considered to be able to develop high-rise buildings or to develop upwards. There are residential dwellings in the original tenants, and public housing can also be built. Learning in the Mainland, let urban and rural areas live together and other urban and rural integration.

Many social organizations have indicated that they should review the current Ding and Ding Wu policy or, in the event of land shortage, use the Lands Resumption Ordinance to redevelop land for development.

Group: Need to review Ding’s small house policy

Mr Liu said that it is not feasible to use the Ordinance to reclaim land because many of the ancestral halls in the New Territories are the long-term assets of the New Territories and are protected by law.

Li Zhiming, the vice chairman of the Land Supervision Department, said that the current height limit of the Ding House is three floors. Some developments can be more effective. There is no objection to the proper consideration of the relaxation of density development. It is estimated that about 100 to 120 hectares of land can be selected. Development, integration of larger sites to build public housing, depending on the location, the density is about three times reasonable.

However, in the rural areas where the density development is to be carried out, it is necessary to consider a number of factors in detail, including the proportion of the rights and interests of the original residents, whether to allocate the original residents to the original floor, and the type of housing to be developed. Therefore, the government can be the second big debate. Considering a comprehensive review of the existing issues of small house policy and Ding Quan. Although there are great opportunities for long-term judicial review and disputes, I believe it will be difficult to avoid in the future.

In the short-term and medium-term land supply, it is recommended to develop the Fanling High Court and use public-private partnerships to expand private farmland. However, the public-sector ratio is recommended to be more than 70%. In the initial implementation, land quotas should be set.