7/7/2017-2

Push the first set on the plate Lin Zheng: first to have to

Prime Minister Zheng Yue’e said that if the Hong Kong people first put on the plate, the first land, the Government is not I do not know the source of land development, but the community has no consensus and determination; also refers to the agricultural land, brown land and country parks border can be considered.

Rural land can be considered

When asked about when the introduction of the Hong Kong people mentioned in the election campaign, Mr Lam said that he would not want to use the land allocated for public housing purposes to implement the plan because of the availability of new land sources. Priority should be made at the grassroots level. It is also considered that the source of land supply can be considered as a group of experts on the development of land and land, as well as the land of the country, the country and the country, rather than the vacant vacant school premises. An official member.

As for the pricing of the car plate, Lin Zheng said that there are different claims, such as building fees plus a small fee, the proportion of mortgage, or the median income of the family to do the basis, but the above argument is only assumed that the Government is completely count.

Was asked whether the office is to rise or down the property market? Lin Zheng said he would not say the problem of rising or falling, worried that his remarks will affect the property market, but hope that the public to make the public have the hope of home ownership, the most prudent approach is to increase supply. Whether it will push down spicy measures? She refers to Hong Kong is an international city, can not let foreign people buy a house, you can do just add spicy, can reduce spicy depending on the market situation.

Mr Lin said that in the future, an expert leadership group would be set up to conduct a “social debate” on the source of land supply. She said yesterday that she hoped the debate would be better.

In addition, in respect of the abolition of the MPF hedge, Mr Lam said that both employers and employees did not accept the crossed scheme proposed by the Government. “It is not anti- Gold and severance pay without retrospective. She described, is not the problem of money, the argument is to cancel the hedge after the issue. Lin Zheng said earlier that the government is willing to take more, 890 billion can be considered.

Withdraw the MPF hedge must be mutual understanding

Asked whether there is a limit on the amount of her mind, Lin Zheng said only can be discussed, but also refers to “hedging every year is only more than 30 billion, not many.”

She also reiterated that the bottom line of the Government is sure to abolish the hedge, but the Government’s commitment can not replace the responsibility of the employer, the program can not constitute moral hazard. Mr Lam stressed that it was not necessary to reinvent the Government’s proposal and to consult again. It was only on the basis of discussions with both employers and employees on the basis of confidence in the eventual resolution of the abolition of the hedge and that “the method must be mutual understanding and mutual assistance”.