In clothing, food, housing, and travel, there are three Hong Kongs that outperform London and New York
But living alone, property prices are unattainable, and “no land” has become a major social contradiction. In recent years, there are many reasons for opposing land-building, but reducing supply, who benefits the most? At least the biggest loss is the general public, especially the next generation.
Now Hong Kong is the hottest time, but it can be said that it is the best time to solve the land supply in the past 20 years. Hong Kong people should seize the opportunity, put down their grievances, and reunite. It is more important to solve the deep-seated contradictions in society. Improving housing supply is a top priority and solving housing problems.
If everyone is united and increase their land, they are convinced that the central government will certainly support it
The author thinks that the “80,000” policy should be re-introduced, or the “Building 850,000” can be changed to “developing 850,000 units of mature land” to minimize potential side effects and maximize benefits.
In addition, the Chief Executive needs to use the Lands Resumption Ordinance more decisively and adopt a highly environmentally friendly development approach to develop 3% to 5% of the country’s land
Environmental protection is a management issue. Now Hong Kong’s environmental protection is a religious ethical development ban and a wrong concept of environmental protection. If the Government wants to show its sincerity, it can give up the entire Fanling Golf Course more thoroughly. It is stated that any land project is adopted. The high property price is because of the “monopoly caused by various counter-proposal reasons”. As long as a message of strict governance is given out In disguise, the situation of land monopoly will be broken. Naturally, there will be a certain degree of small investors who will stop making profits, and developers will not hoard. The author believes that the rise in property prices can be appropriately restricted within two or three months. In the new round of global quantitative easing cycle, more people will get the opportunity to get on the bus.